Let me tell you how it will be
There's one for you, nineteen for me
'Cause I'm the taxman, yeah, I'm the taxman
Should five per cent appear too small
Be thankful I don't take it all
'Cause I'm the taxman, yeah I'm the taxman
If you drive a car, I'll tax the street,
If you try to sit, I'll tax your seat.
If you get too cold I'll tax the heat,
If you take a walk, I'll tax your feet.
Don't ask me what I want it for………
The Beatles “Taxman”
as to procure the largest quantity of feathers
with the least possible amount of hissing.”
Jean-Baptiste Colbert
French Minister of Finance
for King Louis XIV
I am finally going to wrap
up my Tax Saga on the flip side of my 2014 Tax Experience. How the incremental cost of taxes (for us) and
a system of powerful unresponsive bureaucrats outweighed what I saw as the benefits
of continued full time employment even though I was at the financial peak of my
career.
The decision Barbara and I
made together in 2007 to retire early was based on a bunch of factors, and yes taxes
influenced a part of it. One was my health, which
at that time was not great. The job
itself was very demanding (I was in the middle of a corporate firestorm as
mentioned in an earlier post). I had to
travel ungodly amounts and during my travels I often thought of my father who retired in his early 60’s and died at age 72, only a few months before he
and my mom were to celebrate their 50th anniversary. Another was our years of pretty standard middle
class “vanilla” style living with an emphasis on saving which left us with a nice
nest egg. We only owned one “home”-in
Stowe as we sold our Yardley Home when Eric left for the Marine Corps. We never bought boats, fancy cars etc. when I
started getting greater recognition at AIG.
Much of that recognition went into our savings. On the flip side my “leverage” in the company
was extremely high and my “prospects” for continued employment and financial
reward was good. AIG’s financial woes
with mortgage “bets” had not started (well at least not yet surfaced).
Somehow, however, the
extra money they paid me did not seem so much after the various tax authorities
got their hands on it. I found that despite the increased pay, my incremental
increase in salary was being taxed at higher amounts. I found that instead of taking home say 75%
of what I made I was taking home about 60%.
In other words a future 10% raise amounted to 4 or 5 % at best.
Let me further clarify my
definition of how much I “took home” (using the same benchmarks as The Clintons).
It includes all federal payroll taxes, state and local taxes and charitable
giving. I feel it boggles the mind to
contemplate just how much taxes our governments really collect. Not included in my numbers are gas taxes,
sales taxes, liquor taxes, tobacco taxes, soda taxes, that tax on your phone
bill, fuel surcharges etc. etc. On
corporations there are lots of taxes, I paid some when I ran my little
consulting business. Heck The Town of
Stowe has a local tax on restaurants and bars, which we contributed too
frequently. When one thinks about how virtually EVERY state and local
government is “underfunded” and how the Federal Debt climbs EVERY day I get a
sense it really is a house built on sinking sand despite all these taxes. Yet
so many say we need to tax more because we need to spend more. Mercifully
guys I will talk about “spending” in some other post. Maybe Zuckerberg, Buffet, The Clintons and
The Trumps (if he paid any) should pay more but if you really study the situation you realize it will not
fix our underlying problems. In theory
their taxes are shaved by lower individual rates on non-wage or “capital”
income but in reality Corporations Profits which are distributed to them are
generally taxed heftily, before given to stockholders.
Ok to move along, in case
you have a question as to why charitable giving is included in my totals I need
to clarify because it becomes doubly important to my story. First we have always felt of it as a chance to
give back some of the incredible blessings we received. Second by supporting others it may decrease
their need to ask the government for help.
Finally this is “recognized” in the tax code by a tax deduction which
means our political system attaches value as well. Yet it was this giving and a tax event that
occurred in June 2007 which really disheartened my whole attitude about the Federal
Tax System.
In 2007 Barbara and I went
through what I felt was a brutal IRS audit as they questioned the veracity of our
prior returns deductions for Charitable Contributions.
Now understand we had for years a personal commitment to tithe not only
all to our church at the time but to credible organizations like the Red Cross,
The local Women’s and Homeless Shelter’s, The USO, Salvation Army even
Lafayette College (Back Then). We always
included the original documents from these charities (letters from them
documenting the amounts etc.). Suddenly
the IRS advised us they were unilaterally disallowing these contributions
within 30 days unless we provided “additional evidence” it was a large amount
of back taxes and interest presented as a bill.
When we asked what is meant by additional evidence the IRS responded cancelled
checks, period. Now trust me this was not a nice polite letter indicating can
you provide some additional info as we need to verify our file. It was a bill and a threat. Welcome to the judge, and jury and oh we think you are a
crook. As luck would not have it we had
issued these checks from a combined broker/cash account and had switched a few
months prior to a different one. Even back in 2007 nobody sent you cancelled
checks you had to get them online, something we no longer had access too. In addition at the time our Son Eric was
getting ready to deploy to Iraq so we asked the IRS if we could have a couple
more weeks. The basically said F you and
so we (well Barbara) scrambled to get copies of checks etc. and express mailing
them to the IRS. Well as luck would have it they………lost them
internally. Despite our postal record
that they had received them they got more arrogant and demanded we resend them. Apparently they believed we were tax owing
cheats and indicated they would also start to assess garnishments and
penalties. I kid you not. My tenacious Editor spent hours demanding and
getting an advocate within the IRS to whom we eventually got the ANOTHER copy
of the information to and finally the IRS conceded that our cash contributions “checked
out”. You would think we were done but oh
no.
A week or two later we were notified that our “Non
Cash” deduction of $475 to the Goodwill (whose receipts we also sent) was
disallowed. Now when we moved to NY in
2006 we gave away tons of household goods, many to neighbors but a lot to
Goodwill. Things like furniture,
clothes, sports equipment etc. I had
receipts for over $1,000 dollars from Goodwill but that nice tax adviser I
mentioned in a prior post felt that might be tough to “get by” the IRS without
actual photos (never thought of that). So
we declared what he thought would be something they would not question without
a possible issue.
Now this last insult REALLY ticked
me off. I wrote the IRS and said sue
me. I explained our move and that I
could have held a yard sale pocketed the money and never report it. I did not hear back, thank goodness. I would have hated to pay a lawyer for that. At
the time I was prepared to fight further
by showing how the Clinton’s (yes I am sorry to bring them in again but I had
to share the full story) when he was governor of Arkansas deducted $2.00 for a
pair of donated underwear (if you need a laugh about non-cash deductions read this 1993
article from WaPo I was going to print and send to the IRS back then) https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/lifestyle/1993/12/28/bill-clintons-great-skivvies-give-away/0dac853d-cf3d-4faf-8104-bcf124bd93b4/?utm_term=.5df007838cc0
but thankfully never had to play that card.
So in a nutshell a person who
never complained about paying his fair obligations and felt it important to
support my country financially was disillusioned by it all. I felt that working and paying taxes to a
system that looked at me (and my success and generosity) as an “enemy” was simply not worth
it. We could live a comfortable enough
life with less income and lower tax percentages. My 2014 tax year sure proved that! So in the
late summer/early fall 2007 I went to my boss at AIG and informed him that I
would like to retire in 18 months. After some shock and dismay they asked if I would consider working a just few more
years. I then negotiated a shorter work week
working out of my house in Stowe for two years.
Not surprisingly the shorter workweek lowered my income about 20% but my
“take home” remained virtually unchanged, wonder why?
I am ashamed to admit this
but in the years after I became more a than a little obsessed with legally “screwing
the feds” I shifted a significant percentage of our savings to municipal bonds
(exempt from Federal Taxes) in part JUST to not pay taxes I regulating my
consulting hours (a luxury I understand many do not have) to four or five days
per month, mainly to enjoy life more but as an added benefit it minimized my
tax bracket. Yes, less work and gross income but not as big a hit to net
income. My Federal and State Tax bills went down and down until lo and behold
thanks to that “windfall” Trade Adjustment tax credit out of the blue I
succeeded so much with a little luck I paid a
2014 negative tax which I achieved in the fall of 2016. Take that
IRS!!!!! It was also the inspiration to starting this blog.
OK so why am I boring you
all with this, besides feeling a bit evil that I succeeded in an objective to legal
beat the IRS and a crappy tax system that I believe is a disgrace. In my earlier
posts a couple of you agreed, but all of us tend to just shrug and move on
saying it cannot get fixed. However, I
am convinced that without real tax reform we as a nation will slowly
strangulate. Not just because cynics
like me do “tax avoidance” strategies but I think it becomes a motivation for
many to work less- both the rich (tax avoidance) and the poor (entitlements make
marginal employment not worth it). It also has given rise for many to work
under the table. It breeds cynicism about “fairness” from a majority of citizens. Certainly I feel a little guilty now, not for
achieving a weird goal, but for not paying my fair share. Consider this Blog post my confession and
penance, but while I will support real tax reform I will continue to personal
maximize my tax strategies. Maybe if we
all did it our elected officials will affect some real change. I do not hold my
breath.
Thanks for listening to my
confession, now I feel much better!
With that I call it quits
on my tax discussion. My editor tells me
all this has been fun but give it a rest! I do welcome any thoughts you may
have on this specific topic or the blog in general.
Until next week
Adieu
But then again Mr. Maury Rider, you forget that your faithful and obedient companion volunteered every year to bear the weight from the IRS and go to jail as the rest and solitude would do me good!
ReplyDeleteYou last point is the thing that infuriates me- under the table earnings! I have no problem with giving people a few bucks for helping out but there is an entire underground economy that we could see first hand in Vermont. Pay cash, get a discount! I will continue to side with any politician who promotes fair & honest taxation.
Interesting stories, I am very happy I was a few hundred miles away in 2007. My guess is the IRS representatives have some not so fond memories of the experience.
ReplyDeleteDo you think any significant tax reform will be passed this spring? If so, will it and should it include the Border Tax? I for one would love to see the reform but am concerned with the Border Tax. If Trump gets a meaningful package through do you think the protesters will stay home or will they still hate him?
I think people will still hate him because of x & y & z, ad infinitum. It's so much easier to hate (frown) than love (smile). Why do people want to argue about politics all the time when it would be so much more productive to actually do something to help humanity instead of tearing it down. Which is kind of crazy but I think it's the human condition. As long as we can justify our superiority to something/someone we take pride in it instead of looking at the balance of powers and history.
DeleteNo, the experience of the audit was extremely painful and I found the IRS workers very, very abusive and surly. Abolish the IRS is my stance and will be forever. Let's hear it for a consumption tax- hip hip hooray!
Steve and Barbara,
ReplyDeleteThanks for commenting. Barbara if your offer to volunteer jail time still holds. I will refuse to pay that $70 penalty to Vermont if they render an unfavorable position. They can jail you there, kind of a free trip back!
Steve, I am not sure I fully comprehend this border tax thing. In "Theory" over the long term it would be revenue neutral. It does not even sound like a tax but is really a way to handle corporate profits differently for exported and imported goods. Personally it sounds like a just another windfall for the accounting profession but who knows.
I have no special expertise but on my "Tax Fantasy Island" wages and capital would all be taxed a flat percentage in three brackets. 2% for a Married Couple making less than 35,000, 6% up to 75,000 and 15% over that. No deductions or anything. It is the cost for your being a member of US society. I get the need to stimulate Capital but also believe there is some unfairness to taxing wages at 30, 40 or 50%. Oh on fantasy island we would eliminate paper money. All cash would be handled by an ATM card so underground income would get recognized and taxed. If you had someone cleaning your house you would pay them electronically. This would also be how you monitor things like food stamps and other entitlements.
Next, consumption tax. You could exempt food, medicine and clothing up to a certain amount per year (electronic payments remember) you could even pay gas taxes all that stuff with this "magic" payment system. Your credit or debit card would also be linked in. I think it could be done. You could even grade the consumption tax % based on luxury goods, liquor whatever.
I understand Big Brother concerns but doing it automated would eliminate The need for IRS etc I bet we would see high compliance and capture lots more tax revenue equitably! Rich guy wants a Ferrari tax it. Guy wants a Chevy Truck tax that also. If you make it a one time tax on new cars the resale value used increases to offset the pain and spread out the tax for the lifetime of the vehicle!
My two cents!
Any tax reforms this year that do not get rid of our current tx system would be a band aid IMHO!
Jim
My two cents are this. Just because I was speed reading through the blog...and I had the wrong answer....since we are in an everyone wins a trophy era I think I at least deserve a mention for being the FIRST one to answer the question. I"m just saying.
ReplyDeleteAnd of course I just answered a reply to last weeks blog. This whole blogging thing has me flummoxed
DeleteMe too Ethel. Barb's sister Maria just told me she was shocked at 12 posts.
DeleteWhat confuses me is that when I wrote 3 or 4 posts ago followers gave no response to my question about are they getting? I just figure my topics were not interesting to anyone and I get tired of requesting feedback. Makes me sound like I am begging people to read. I write this for fun and my own therapy so "oh well".!
Oh and sorry kid you do deserve a prize . I will give it to you next week😁